First DS: Ugly Look?

Hot Trend

You need 3 min read

·

Post on Nov 23, 2024

20 visitor like this post

Share

My First Data Science Project: Ugly, But a Lesson Learned

Okay, so, my first data science project? Let's just say it wasn't exactly Vogue-worthy. It was, to put it mildly, ugly. Like, really ugly. Think Frankenstein's monster meets a Powerpoint presentation from 1998. But you know what? That ugly duckling taught me more than any perfectly polished project ever could.

The Disaster That Was "Project Titanic"

I was so hyped. I'd just finished my first data science bootcamp – I was pumped. I knew everything about Python, Pandas, and all that jazz. I felt like a data-wiz. So, naturally, I tackled the classic "Titanic" dataset. You know, predicting survival based on passenger data? Beginner stuff. Except… it wasn't.

My first mistake? I went straight for the complex models. XGboost? Random Forests? Bring 'em on! I figured, "More complex = better results," right? Wrong. So wrong. I threw every algorithm I knew at that dataset without cleaning it properly. My code was a mess – spaghetti code, I think they call it? It was a disaster.

The visualizations? Don't even get me started. My graphs looked like a toddler had a fight with a box of crayons. Seriously, it was embarrassing. I was using matplotlib, which is fine. But I had no idea how to make it look decent. My charts were cluttered and hard to interpret. Even I couldn't understand what my graphs were trying to say.

The Ugly Truth About Data Science

This wasn't just about aesthetics, though. My models were garbage. My accuracy score? Pathetic. I mean, I should have started with basic EDA (Exploratory Data Analysis). I got so caught up in the cool algorithms that I totally skipped the crucial first steps: cleaning the data, understanding its distribution, and visualizing it effectively. That's where I went wrong. The models were only as good as the data I fed them, and my data was a mess – lots of missing values, inconsistencies, the works.

What's more? I didn't even bother with feature engineering. I just tossed everything into the model and hoped for the best. It's no wonder my results were awful. My code was convoluted. It was hard to debug. I even had some serious issues with data leakage that wrecked my model's predictive capabilities. This was a harsh lesson.

Turning Ugly into Beautiful (or at Least, Functional)

Here's what I learned, the hard way:

• Start with the basics: Data cleaning, exploration, and visualization are not optional. It's like building a house: you need a solid foundation. Take your time. Get to know your data before jumping into advanced modeling.
• Keep it simple: Start with simpler models like logistic regression before moving on to more complex ones. That's how you get a benchmark, you know? Understand what’s going on. Then you can move onto more advanced techniques.
• Visualizations are KEY: Don't underestimate the power of clear, concise visualizations. They help you understand your data and communicate your findings. Learn to use libraries effectively (Seaborn and Plotly are my go-tos now).
• Document EVERYTHING: My code was a disaster because I didn't comment it. That's why it's hard to even revisit it. Trust me, your future self will thank you.

My first project was ugly, but it was also invaluable. It taught me humility, the importance of solid fundamentals, and the value of clean, well-documented code. And, hey, I can laugh about it now – mostly. I’ve gotten much better at cleaning data and presenting my results effectively since then, so it all worked out in the end. You just gotta embrace the learning process and keep at it.